Concept


Earlier work had shown that DNA is composed of building blocks called nucleotides consisting of a deoxyribose sugar, a phosphate group, and one of four nitrogen bases — adenine (A), thymine (T), guanine (G), and cytosine (C). Phosphates and sugars of adjacent nucleotides link to form a long polymer. Other key experiments showed that the ratios of A-to-T and G-to-C are constant in all living things. X-ray crystallography provided the final clue that the DNA molecule is a double helix, shaped like a twisted ladder. In 1953, the race to determine how these pieces fit together in a three-dimensional structure was won by James Watson and Francis Crick at the Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge England. They showed that alternating deoxyribose and phosphate molecules form the twisted uprights of the DNA ladder. The rungs of the ladder are formed by complementary pairs of nitrogen bases — A always paired with T and G always paired with C.

Animation


I'm James Watson. I'm Francis Crick. In 1953, Francis and I published the first accurate model of the DNA molecule. We were interested in DNA — the hereditary molecule of life. We wanted to build on what was chemically known about DNA, and determine its actual structure. For example, Phoebus Levene had shown that each nucleotide building block of DNA is made up of a phosphate group linked to a deoxyribose sugar — which, in turn, is linked to one of four nitrogenous bases — adenine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C), and thymine (T). Nucleotides are linked in a series — from one phosphate, to the next sugar, to the next phosphate, and so on. Although Levene had proposed the correct chemical linkages, his tetranucleotide theory was wrong. If DNA had a fixed, repetitive sequence, it wouldn't be intelligent enough to carry any information. And after Oswald Avery's landmark paper, we knew that DNA had to be intelligent. In fact, it made more sense if the order of the nucleotides changed. Information can then be coded into the DNA sequence. DNA, not protein, was the Rosetta Stone for unraveling the true secret of life. and so on... I'm Erwin Chargaff. I also thought there had to be more to DNA than just simple repetitive tetranucleotide blocks. I isolated DNA from different organisms and measured the levels of each of the four nitrogenous bases. Here are my results. (Labels: Table adapted from Chargaff's 1949 Paper; calf thymus; beef spleen; yeast; tubercle bacillus) As you can see, the amount of adenine is very close to the amount of thymine. If Levene's tetranucleotide theory was correct, then the amounts of A, T, G and C would be the same in the DNA of all organisms. This is clearly not the case. Instead, the nucleotides must be arranged so that there are about equal amounts of A and T, and about equal amounts of G and C. However, I wasn't able to make sense of these striking, but perhaps meaningless, regularities. As you'll see, Chargaff's base ratios were an important clue in our work on the DNA structure. At about the same time, Linus Pauling at Cal Tech used his knowledge of chemistry and a powerful new technique called X-ray crystallography to discover a corkscrew-shaped structure found in many proteins—the alpha-helix. Francis and I followed Pauling's approach of using chemistry and X-ray diffraction patterns to solve the structure of DNA. X-ray diffraction patterns can provide a lot of information about the shape and structure of a molecule. If a stream of X-rays is directed at a crystallized substance, some rays are diffracted, or scattered, as they encounter the atoms. The scattered X-rays then interfere with each other and produce spots of different intensities and these can be recorded on photographic film. The resulting diffraction pattern is a unique "signature" of the molecule. At the time, DNA couldn't be crystallized but we could get two different types of DNA fibers. These fibers gave two distinct diffraction patterns. Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins made these DNA X-ray diffraction patterns. I concentrated on the X-ray data from this form of DNA. As you can see there are a lot more spots on it and therefore more information. I was able to calculate the basic dimensions of the DNA molecule. While Rosalind was working on the other X-ray crystallograph, Francis was immediately struck by the symmetry of simplicity of this X-ray pattern. It was clear to me that all the information we needed was here in this X-ray pattern. The distinctive "X" in this X-ray photo is the telltale pattern of a helix. Because the X-ray pattern is so regular, the dimensions of the helix must also be consistent. For example, the diameter of the helix stays the same. In an X-ray diffraction pattern, the closer the spots, the larger the actual distance. So the horizontal bars actually correspond to helical turns. The vertical distance between the bars — 34 Angstroms — is a measure of the height of one helical turn. The distance from the middle of the X-ray pattern to the top is measurable at 3.4 angstroms. This corresponds to the distance between two stacked base pairs. Since, we know the height of one helical repeat — 34 angstroms — and we know the distance between stacked base pairs — 3.4 angstroms — there must be 10 nucleotides per helical repeat. The helix's pitch, or its degree of rise, can be calculated from the angle the "X" makes with the horizontal axis. If we distort the helix, you can get an idea how the helical pitch is related to the X-ray pattern. From this X-ray diffraction pattern, I deduced that DNA should be a double helix with the phosphate groups on the outside and the bases on the inside. And from the measurements made by Franklin and Wilkins, we knew the basic dimensions of the helix. Jim and I were eager to fit everything known about DNA into an accurate model. But questions still remained: How do the helices fit together? How are the nitrogen bases arranged? It was a race to solve the DNA structure. We knew that after solving the alpha-helix structure in proteins, Linus Pauling was interested in DNA structure. Just as we were beginning to build tentative DNA models, we heard that Pauling had submitted a paper on the structure for DNA. We waited on pins and needles to review his scheme, which turned out to be a triple helix. Everyone agreed that this model couldn't be right. Pauling put the phosphate groups in the core of each helix with the nitrogenous bases facing out. Three such helices then intertwined to make one DNA molecule. Pauling had forgotten the negative charges of the oxygen atom in each phosphate group. Facing toward the middle, and stacked on top of each other, these charges would repel one another, making it impossible for the molecule to hold together. Almost unbelievably, the man who had written the book on the chemical bond got it wrong. Linus' mistake encouraged us to work even harder, for we knew he would redouble his efforts to set his error right. One day, not long after his paper came out, I began to play with paper cutouts of the nitrogen bases. Linus' mistake encouraged us to work even harder, for we knew he would redouble his efforts to set his error right. One day, not long after his paper came out, I began to play with paper cutouts of the nitrogen bases. I compared the width of different hydrogen bond pairs. Some pairs were obviously different in width. If these pairs really occurred in the DNA helix, then the helix would be uneven and would bulge in and out. In a moment of part insight and part luck, I realized that adenine could pair closely with thymine, and that guanine could pair closely with cytosine. Moreover, the A/T base pair was about the same width as a G/C base pair. This "base pairing" agreed with Chargaff's ratios, and allowed the bases to compactly stack on top of one another. Guanine makes 3 hydrogen bonds with cytosine, and adenine makes 2 hydrogen bonds with thymine. I became convinced that base pairing was the key to DNA's structure. Francis agreed with me. He also pointed out that because of certain bond angles and the proximity of the base pairs, the two helices had to run in opposite directions. The helices are antiparallel to one another. Using metal scraps from the machine shop, Francis and I built a 3-dimensional model of DNA. This six-foot model incorporated what was already known with my A/T and G/C base pairing scheme and Francis' idea of antiparallel strands. Everything clicked into place beautifully. Upon looking at our model, everyone — including Maurice and Rosalind — agreed that we had the right DNA structure. So, DNA is like a twisted ladder, where the sugar and phosphate are the rails, and the base pairs are the rungs. The rails run in opposite orientation to each other. The nucleotide rungs are complementary to each other. Wherever there is an A on one strand, there is a T in the same position on the other strand. Similarly, wherever there is a G on one strand, there is a C in the same position on the other strand. Francis and I were so excited by our beautiful model that we quickly wrote up the results and submitted the 900-word paper to the scientific journal Nature. In the paper, we concluded: It hasn't escaped our notice that the specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material. Maurice and Rosalind published their findings in separate papers following ours.

Gallery


James Watson, 2 years old.
James Watson, 10 years old.
James Watson on a vacation in the Italian Alps, 1951.
April 1, 1953 diary entry of Gerard R. Pomerat, Rockefeller Foundation science officer. Pomerat was on a visit to the Cavendish labs and describes the excitement of Watson and Crick's work.
James Watson (R) and Francis Crick (L) walking along the banks at Cambridge University.
Francis Crick at Cavendish, next to an X-ray tube.
Erwin Chargaff, 1947. He was the first to accurately measure nucleotide amounts in DNA.
The six feet tall metal DNA model made by Watson and Crick in 1953.

Audio/Video


Audio Glossary

Base pair, Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), Double helix, Gene, Genome

Video Interviews

James Dewey Watson

James Watson is President of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. In 1953, he and Francis Crick solved the 3-D structure of DNA. Dr. Watson has a long-term interest in genetics education and is the prime instigator of the DNA from the Beginning project.

Clip 1 (1:06)
The importance of DNA, not proteins, as a genetic molecule.

Clip 2 (0:45)
DNA as a regular, repeating structure -- a helix.

Clip 3 (0:52)
DNA as a double helix.

Clip 4 (0:25)
Linus Pauling's triple-helix model for DNA and the reaction to this incorrect model.

Clip 5 (0:29)
Figuring out the base pairing.

Biography


 

James Watson and Francis Crick solved the structure of DNA. Other scientists, like Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins, also contributed to this discovery.

JAMES DEWEY WATSON (1928-)

James Watson was born in Chicago. As a child, he was bright and inquisitive. One of his favorite words was "why?" and he wasn't satisfied with simple answers. He accumulated a lot of knowledge by reading the World Almanac, and won $100 as a "Quiz Kid" on a popular radio program. He used this money to buy binoculars for bird-watching ? a serious hobby for himself and his father.

Watson entered the University of Chicago at 15 under the gifted youngster program. He did well in courses that interested him, like biology and zoology, and not as well in other courses. He decided that he would go to graduate school and study to become the curator of ornithology at the Museum of Natural History.

In his senior year at Chicago, Watson read Erwin Schrödinger's book: What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. He was fascinated by the idea that genes and chromosomes hold the secrets of life. When Watson went to do a Ph.D. with Salvador Luria, a pioneer in bacteriophage research, at Indiana University, it seemed the perfect opportunity to work on some of these problems.

After his Ph.D. in 1950, Watson spent time in Europe, first in Copenhagen and then at the Cavendish Laboratory of the University of Cambridge. By now, Watson knew that DNA was the key to understanding life and he was determined to solve its structure. He was lucky to share an office with Francis Crick, a Ph.D. student who was also interested in the structure of DNA. Although both were supposed to be working on other projects, in 1953, they built the first accurate model of DNA ? one of the great scientific advances of all time.

In 1962, Watson shared the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine with Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins who, with Rosalind Franklin, provided the data on which the structure was based. Watson wrote The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA, which was published in 1968. This book was the first of its kind, being a gossipy account of the inner workings of the scientific world, and has never been out of print.

In 1956, Watson accepted a position in the Biology department at Harvard University where the focus of his research was RNA and its role in the transfer of genetic information. Although he continued to be a member of the Harvard faculty until 1976, Watson took over the directorship of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in 1968.

Watson has had a long association with Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Salvador Luria and Max Delbrück taught a popular summer course on phage genetics, and during his graduate days, Watson enjoyed this "summer camp" for scientists. Watson has made Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory one of the world's premier research facilities for cancer, neurobiology, and basic molecular genetics. Currently, Watson is the President of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

Watson has played a significant role in the development of science policy, from the War on Cancer, through the debates over the use of recombinant DNA, to promoting the Human Genome Project. From 1988 to 1992, he ran the Human Genome Project at the National Institutes of Health while still directing Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

One of his major interests is education. His first textbook, Molecular Biology of the Gene, set new standards for biology textbooks, and it was followed by Molecular Biology of the Cell, and Recombinant DNA. He is actively exploring the avenue of multimedia education and the WWW through projects being developed at the DNA Learning Center, the educational arm of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. He was and is one of the main motivators of this project, DNA from the Beginning.

Watson has been described by many as brilliant, outspoken and eccentric. He is energized by intelligent people and doesn't suffer fools. Watson is an avid tennis player and has been ever since his grad school days. He still tries to play tennis every day.

FRANCIS HARRY COMPTON CRICK (1916-2004)

Francis Crick was born in a small town near Northampton, England. As a child, Crick was very inquisitive and he read all of the books of Children's Encyclopedia that his parents bought him. He found the sections that dealt with science most interesting. This interest led to "kitchen" experiments and eventually serious study and a second-class Honours degree in physics at University College, London.

The physics Crick learned in class was already out of date, so he taught himself the rudiments of quantum mechanics while doing graduate research on the viscosity of water. World War II interrupted his graduate studies. During the war, Crick worked for the Admiralty doing mostly research and design on magnetic and acoustic mines.

When the war ended, Crick continued to work at the Admiralty but he knew he did not want to design weapons for the rest of his life. The problem was that he was unsure what he did want to do. In the end, he decided to enter the life sciences. He liked reading, thinking, and talking about the new discoveries being made in the life sciences. Crick found that "what you are really interested in is what you gossip about." To pursue his interests, Crick visited several labs and scientists. He finally settled in for a two year stint at Strangeways Laboratory where he did work on the effects of magnetism on chick fibroblast cells.

In 1947, armed with this biology experience, Crick joined Max Perutz at the Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge. Sir Lawrence Bragg was directing a new unit of the Laboratory where they were using X-ray crystallography to study protein structure. Max Perutz was working on the structure of hemoglobin and Crick's thesis project was on X-ray diffraction of proteins.

In 1951, Francis Crick met James Watson who was visiting Cambridge. Although Crick was twelve years older, he and Watson "hit it off immediately." Watson ended up staying at Cavendish, and using available X-ray data and model building, the two solved the structure of DNA. The classic paper was published in Nature in April 1953. A flip of the coin decided the order of the names on the paper. Francis Crick, James Watson and Maurice Wilkins shared the 1962 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for solving the structure of DNA. Maurice Wilkins and Rosalind Franklin provided some of the X-ray crystallographic data.

After the "double helix" model, there were still questions about how DNA directed the synthesis of proteins. Crick and some of his fellow scientists, including James Watson, were members of the informal "RNA tie club," whose purpose was "to solve the riddle of RNA structure, and to understand the way it builds proteins." The club focused on the "Central Dogma" where DNA was the storehouse of genetic information and RNA was the bridge that transferred this information from the nucleus to the cytoplasm where proteins were made. The theory of RNA coding was debated and discussed, and in 1961, Francis Crick and Sydney Brenner provided genetic proof that a triplet code was used in reading genetic material.

For most of his career, Crick was at Cambridge working for the Medical Research Council. In 1976, Crick moved to the Salk Institute in La Jolla where he focused his research on developmental neurobiology. In 1988, he wrote about his experiences in What Mad Pursuit: A Personal View of Scientific Discovery. Crick has been described as having a keen intellect and a dry, British sense of humor.

ROSALIND ELSIE FRANKLIN (1920-1958)

Rosalind Franklin was born in London, England. Her family was well-to-do and both sides were very involved in social and public works. Franklin's father wanted to be a scientist, but World War I cut short his education and he became a college teacher instead. Rosalind Franklin was extremely intelligent and she knew by the age of 15 that she wanted to be a scientist. Her father actively discouraged her interest since it was very difficult for women to have such a career. However, with her excellent education from St. Paul's Girls' School ? one of the few institutions at the time that taught physics and chemistry to girls ? Franklin entered Cambridge University in 1938 to study chemistry.

When she graduated, Franklin was awarded a research scholarship to do graduate work. She spent a year in R.G.W. Norrish's lab without great success. Norrish recognized Franklin's potential but he was not very encouraging or supportive toward his female student. When offered the position as an assistant research officer at the British Coal Utilization Research Association (CURA), Franklin gave up her fellowship and took the job.

CURA was a young organization and there was less formality on the way research had to be done. Franklin worked fairly independently, a situation that suited her. Franklin worked for CURA until 1947 and published a number of papers on the physical structure of coal.

Franklin's next career move took her to Paris. An old friend introduced her to Marcel Mathieu who directed most of the research in France. He was impressed with Franklin's work and offered her a job as a "chercheur" in the Laboratoire Central des Services Chimiques de l'Etat. Here she learned X-ray diffraction techniques from Jacques Mering.

In 1951, Franklin was offered a 3-year research scholarship at King's College in London. With her knowledge, Franklin was to set up and improve the X-ray crystallography unit at King's College. Maurice Wilkins was already using X-ray crystallography to try to solve the DNA problem at King's College. Franklin arrived while Wilkins was away and on his return, Wilkins assumed that she was hired to be his assistant. It was a bad start to a relationship that never got any better.

Working with a student, Raymond Gosling, Franklin was able to get two sets of high-resolution photos of crystallized DNA fibers. She used two different fibers of DNA, one more highly hydrated than the other. From this she deduced the basic dimensions of DNA strands, and that the phosphates were on the outside of what was probably a helical structure.

She presented her data at a lecture in King's College at which James Watson was in attendance. In his book The Double Helix, Watson admitted to not paying attention at Franklin's talk and not being able to fully describe the lecture and the results to Francis Crick. Watson and Crick were at the Cavendish Laboratory and had been working on solving the DNA structure. Franklin did not know Watson and Crick as well as Wilkins did and never truly collaborated with them. It was Wilkins who showed Watson and Crick the X-ray data Franklin obtained. The data confirmed the 3-D structure that Watson and Crick had theorized for DNA. In 1953, both Wilkins and Franklin published papers on their X-ray data in the same Nature issue with Watson and Crick's paper on the structure of DNA.

Franklin left Cambridge in 1953 and went to the Birkbeck lab to work on the structure of tobacco mosaic virus. She published a number of papers on the subject and she actually did a lot of the work while suffering from cancer. She died from cancer in 1958.

In 1962, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded to James Watson, Francis Crick, and Maurice Wilkins for solving the structure of DNA. The Nobel committee does not give posthumous prizes.

MAURICE HUGH FREDERICK WILKINS (1916-2004)

Maurice Wilkins was born in Pongaroa, New Zealand. His father was a doctor and in order to pursue his interest in preventative medicine, moved the family to England when Wilkins was six. Wilkins believes that having spent his formative years in New Zealand, he was imbued with the exploratory and adventuresome nature of the early settlers - traits that proved useful in his career as a scientists.

In 1938, Wilkins graduated with a physics degree from St. John's college in Cambridge. Since England was at war, scientists especially physicists were in great demand. Wilkins worked with John Randall at Birmingham University on improving the radar. This earned him a Ph.D. in 1940, and some of Wilkins work is still used in today's radar.

In 1943, the physics department at Birmingham University, Wilkins included, moved to Berkeley, California to work on the Manhattan Project. At the time, it was all part of the war effort. However, after the devastating effects of the atomic bomb at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Wilkins became and continues to be an opponent against nuclear weapons.

After the war, Wilkins was hired as a physics lecturer at St. Andrews' University. Here, he again met with John Randall, now Sir John, who wanted to use physics to study biological problems. Randall was offered a full professorship at King's College in London and there he set up a biophysics lab with Wilkins as one of his members of the Medical Research Council Biophysics Research Unit.

Wilkins studied biological molecules like DNA and viruses using a variety of microscopes and spectrophotometers. He eventually began using X-rays to produce diffraction images of DNA molecules. The X-ray diffraction images produced by him, Rosalind Franklin, and Raymond Gosling led to the deduction by James Watson and Francis Crick of the 3-dimensional helical nature of DNA. Wilkins shared the 1962 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine with Watson and Crick.

Wilkins was made a Companion of the British Empire in 1962 and has won other awards and prizes for his work. He collected sculptures and was fond of gardening.

Factoid

Links


 

Links

RasMol and Chime: Molecular Visualization Freeware

Highly recommended. Download and install the Chime plug-in and you can look at DNA as you've never seen it before. Chime is a program that allows you to rotate, move and look at molecules in your web browser.

Access Excellence

As part of their archives on favorite classroom activities submitted by high school biology and life sciences teachers, the transcript of an interview with Dr. Francis Crick is available.

LionBook Web site

Developed by the authors of Biology, the Living Science, this web site has the Watson and Crick paper: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid, and also A Reader's Guide to James D. Watson's The Double Helix. There are also interesting essays on the process of scientific discovery.

Crystallography 101

This site is from Dr. Bernhard Rupp's lab at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and has a tutorial on X-ray crystallography.

Left-handed DNA Hall of Fame/Wall of Shame

This web site is maintained by Tom Schneider at the National Institutes of Health. As he says, "many artists will flip a picture of DNA over and reverse the twist [from right-handed to left-handed]... This error has become so pervasive that even well-known scientists, major scientific journals and institutes make it." His web site has a collection of these mistakes.

Bibliography

  • Baldwin, Joyce, 1994, DNA Pioneer: James Watson and the Double Helix, Walker and Company, New York.

  • Crick, Francis, 1988, What Mad Pursuit: A Personal View of Scientific Discovery, Basic Books, Inc., New York.

  • Dunn, L.C., 1991, A Short History of Genetics: The Development of Some of the Main Lines of Thought: 1864-1939, Iowa State University Press, Ames.

  • Judson, Horace Freeland, 1979, The Eighth Day of Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Biology, Simon and Schuster, New York.

  • Lagerkvist, Ulf, 1998, DNA Pioneers and Their Legacy, Yale University Press, New Haven.

  • Morange, Michel, 1998, A History of Molecular Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • Nobel Lectures in Molecular Biology 1933-1975, 1977, Elsevier North-Holland, Inc., New York.

  • Olby, Robert, 1974, The Path to the Double Helix: The Discovery of DNA, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.

  • Portugal, Franklin H., and Cohen, Jack S., 1977, A Century of DNA: A History of the Structure and Function of the Genetic Substance, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • Rosenfield, Israel, and Ziff, Edward, and Van Loon, Borin, 1983, DNA for Beginners, Writers and Readers Publishing, Inc.

  • Sayre, Anne, 1975, Rosalind Franklin & DNA, W. W. Norton and Company, New York, New York.

  • Stubbe, Hans, 1972 (English Translation), History of Genetics, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • Sturtevant, A. H., 1965, A History of Genetics, Harper & Row, Publishers, New York.

  • Sweeny, Brian, ed. 1999, Maurice Wilkins, DNA Enabler, The New Zealand Edge, NZEDGE.COM, 2000.

  • Taylor, J. Herbert, 1965, Selected Papers on Molecular Genetics, Academic Press, New York.

  • Watson, James D., 1987, Molecular Biology of the Gene, The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., Menlo Park, California.

  • Watson, James D., 1980, The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA, W.W. Norton & Company, New York.

Glossary


Base pair - Two bases which form a "rung of the DNA ladder." A DNA nucleotide is made of a molecule of sugar, a molecule of phosphoric acid, and a molecule called a base. The bases are the "letters" that spell out the genetic code. In DNA, the code letters are A, T, G, and C, which stand for the chemicals adenine, thymine, guanine, and cytosine, respectively. In base pairing, adenine always pairs with thymine, and guanine always pairs with cytosine.
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) -
Double helix - The structural arrangement of DNA, which looks something like an immensely long ladder twisted into a helix, or coil. The sides of the "ladder" are formed by a backbone of sugar and phosphate molecules, and the "rungs" consist of nucleotide bases joined weakly in the middle by hydrogen bonds.
Gene - The functional and physical unit of heredity passed from parent to offpsring. Genes are pieces of DNA, and most genes contain the information for making a specific protein.
Genome - All the DNA contained in an organism or a cell, which includes both the chromosomes within the nucleus and the DNA in mitochondria.

Children resemble their parents.
Genes come in pairs.
Genes don't blend.
Some genes are dominant.
Genetic inheritance follows rules.
Genes are real things.
All cells arise from pre-existing cells.
Sex cells have one set of chromosomes; body cells have two.
Specialized chromosomes determine gender.
Chromosomes carry genes.
Genes get shuffled when chromosomes exchange pieces.
Evolution begins with the inheritance of gene variation.
Mendelian laws apply to human beings.
Mendelian genetics cannot fully explain human health and behavior.
DNA and proteins are the molecules of the cell nucleus.
One gene makes one protein.
A gene is made of DNA.
Bacteria and viruses have DNA too.
A half DNA ladder is a template for copying the whole.
RNA is an intermediary between DNA and protein.
DNA words are three letters long.
A gene is a discrete sequence of DNA nucleotides.
The RNA message is sometimes edited.
Some viruses store genetic information in RNA.
RNA was the first genetic molecule.
Mutations are changes in genetic information.
Some types of mutations are automatically repaired.
A chromosome is a package for DNA.
Higher cells incorporate an ancient chromosome.
Some DNA does not encode protein.
Some DNA can jump.
Genes can be turned on and off.
Genes can be moved between species.
DNA responds to signals from outside the cell.
Different genes are active in different kinds of cells.
Master genes control basic body plans.
Development balances cell growth and death.
A genome is an entire set of genes.
Living things share common genes.
DNA is only the starting point for understanding human biology.
adi_at_dnaftb